Justice Minister Stavros Kontonis and the President of the Council of State Nikolaos Sakellariou clashed on Sunday over the wealth statements of Greece’s judges who are supposed to disclose their assets. Recently the Council of State had frozen the Law requirement for judges to submit wealth statements. Kontonis attacked saying every public person must be subject to controls. Sakellariou stroke back accusing the minister of “open intervention in justice.”
In a state governed by the rule of law, every person and especially those in a position to make decisions – whether a politician or a judge – has to be subject to controls of his or her income and assets, Justice Minister Stavros Kontonis insisted on Sunday, following a public spat with the chief justice of the Council of State, Nikolaos Sakellariou, over wealth statements submitted by judges.
The statement followed earlier tension sparked during the 33rd regular general assembly of the Union of Public Prosecutors of Greece, when Kontonis had referred to problems caused by a recent Council of State ruling that had frozen the requirement for judges to submit wealth statements.
This prompted an angry response from Sakellariou, who got up and accused him of “open intervention in justice” and stressed that justice did “not accept suggestions from anyone.”
“It is not possible for some to imagine that there are no courts. For the last time I call for self-restraint. I cannot state a position on wealth statements because the case is still in council. Court decisions, whether one likes it or not, must be respected because this is ordained by the Constitution. [The judges] democratic legitimacy is given to us by the Constitution,” Sakellariou said, strongly criticising the minister’s statement.
The head of the Public Prosecutors’ Union Dimitris Asprogerakas also weighed in to note that judges were exempted by a court ruling and that the constitution requires complete respect of court rulings.
Without second thought, Greek opposition parties New Democracy, Democratic Ailment and to Potami moved to support Sakellariou and the judges. Especially, ND demanded Kontonis’ resignation.
At the same time, the government,its MEPs and MPs supported Kontonis and ‘transparency’ for every public person.
SYRIZA MEP Dimitris Papadimoulis commented on Twitter
Το αίτημα να καταθέτουν δήλωση πόθεν έσχες και οι δικαστές, δεν αποτελεί «ωμή παρέμβαση στην Δικαιοσύνη», όπως αδίκως ισχυρίζεται ο Πρόεδρος του ΣτΕ. Είναι απάντηση στην εύλογη απαίτηση της ελληνικής κοινωνίας για ισονομία κ διαφάνεια. Η τεχνητή οξύτητα δεν κρύβει την αλήθεια…
— Dim. Papadimoulis (@papadimoulis) December 10, 2017
The request that prosecutors and judges submit [assets] did not constitute a “blatant intervention in Justice”, as the President of the Council of State is wrongly arguing. It is a response to the reasonable demand of Greek society for equality and transparency. Artificial acidity does not hide the truth …
Disclosure of income and assets “Pothen Ecshes” (Where from) is an obligation for government officials, ministers, lawmakers, mayors and other high-ranking officials. It does not say much about the source of their assets, however, it gives a stand of the wealth and its yearly changes.
The question is: is there any normal citizen who agrees with judges’ exception?
What do you think?