During the Bronze Age, two important civilizations emerged in Greece: the Minoans and, later, the Mycenaeans. These ancient peoples were among the earliest of the so-called “high cultures” of Europe: they communicated with sophisticated writing systems, painted elaborate frescoes, and—in the case of the Mycenaeans—built fortifications so large that later Greeks believed the structures had been created by giants.
As Megan Gannon reports for Live Science, researchers recently conducted an extensive genomic analysis of Minoan and Mycenaean DNA. Their findings suggest that the two groups shared common ancestry, and that they are genetically linked to the Greeks of today.
Additionally, traditional scholarship has posited that the Minoans and Mycenaeans were two distinct peoples, according to Phys.org. But the new study suggests that this might not be the case.
Researchers analyzed DNA samples from 19 Bronze Age individuals. Ann Gibbons of Science reports that the remains belonged to 10 Minoans from Crete, four Mycenaeans, and five people from other early Bronze Age cultures of Greece and Turkey. The team compared 1.2 million letters of genetic code from these individuals to the genomes of 334 people from other ancient cultures, along with those of 30 modern Greeks.
In a significant revelation, researchers found that Minoans and Mycenaeans were closely related. At least three-quarters of DNA from both groups came from “the first Neolithic farmers of Western Anatolia and the Aegean,” the authors of the study write. Both cultures also inherited DNA from the peoples of the eastern Caucasus, located near modern-day Iran.
“This finding suggests that some migration occurred in the Aegean and southwestern Anatolia from further east after the time of the earliest farmers,” says Iosif Lazaridis, a Harvard University geneticist and co-author of the study, according to Phys.org.
Though the genomes of the Minoans and Mycenaeans were similar, they were not identical. Interestingly, the Mycenaeans shared four to 16 percent of their DNA with early hunter-gatherers of eastern Europe and Siberia. The authors of the study speculate that this finding points to another early migration to Greece—one that did not reach the Minoan homestead of Crete.
Researchers also observed genetic links between the Mycenaeans and modern inhabitants of Greece, “with some dilution of the early Neolithic ancestry,” the authors of the study write. The team posits that their findings “support the idea of continuity but not isolation in the history of populations of the Aegean.”
As Gibbons points out, the study’s findings are particularly nifty because ancient Greeks believed that they hailed from the early inhabitants of the Aegean. Homer’s account of the Trojan War, for instance, tells of an epic battle waged by Agamemnon—king of Mycenae and leader of the Greek troops. The heroes of ancient mythology were fictional, of course, but the genetic connections between successive Greek cultures may have been very real indeed.
Fresco from Knossos
Fresco from Tyrins (Mycenae)
To tell you the truth when I was at elementary school 5.-6. grade I was always thinking Minoans and Mycenaeans were optically if not the same, at least relatives.
“To tell you the truth when I was at elementary school 5.-6. grade I was always thinking Minoans and Mycenaeans were optically if not the same, at least relatives.”
Me too ktg…
Bild magasine & all our other critics are not going to like this for sure. Remember all those ‘mongrel race’ statements, ‘no relation to the ancient Greeks’ etc?
An interesting sidebar: after the Mycenean civilisation dissolved in 1200 BC, many joined the Sea Peoples as a distinct group called the Palestra. Within 150 years, as recovery was underway the Palestra settled in….Palestine…whence the name.
the name palestine derives from the semitic name filistin – whose people of course appears in old testament as ‘philistaioi’….it also is known from the phoenician and the earlier babylonian and egyptian. much earlier than 1200 bc.
one more thing – to speak of ‘high’ cultures (and thus imply ‘low’ cultures is a fairly antiquated way to think about history…(eg. when we had the parthenon, they were living in caves…)