The leaders of seven countries of the European south were supposed to talks about Brexit. The US strike against Syria topped the agenda in Madrid nistead.
The leaders of southern EU nations said on Monday that a US missile strike on a Syrian air base in retaliation for a suspected chemical attack was “understandable,” as diplomatic tensions mount over the incident.
Gathered at a summit in Madrid on the EU as Britain prepares to leave the bloc, the leaders – including Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy and France’s Francois Hollande – also called on Brussels and London to first negotiate divorce terms before any future deal with the union.
“The strike launched by the United States on Shayrat Airfield in Syria had the understandable intention to prevent and deter the spread and use of chemical weapons and was limited and focused on this objective,” the seven leaders said in a joint statement after the summit.
Last week’s suspected attack on a rebel-held Syrian town killed at least 87 civilians, including many children.
In their statement, the leaders condemned “in the strongest terms the air strike with chemical weapons”.
“The repeated use of chemical weapons in Syria, both by the (Bashar al-) Assad regime since 2013 and by Daesh (Islamic State group) constitute war crimes,” they added.
News of the Apr 4 tragedy provoked strong condemnation, including from Washington.
US President Donald Trump said the alleged attack “crosses many, many lines”.
On Thursday, he ordered a massive military strike against the Syrian air base in retaliation for the attack that Washington said involved a sarin-like nerve agent.
The United States has also taken a hard line with Russia, which supports the Assad regime.
While stopping short of accusing the Russians of complicity, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has accused Moscow of being “incompetent” in failing to prevent it, and possibly “outmanoeuvred” by the Syrian regime.
Speaking after the Madrid meeting, Hollande said the alleged attack had demanded a response, which he said Washington had provided.
“The Russians cannot decide alone the future of this country along with Iran,” he said, pointing to another Assad ally.
Syria aside, the summit in Madrid – which apart from Rajoy and Hollande also brought together the leaders of Italy, Portugal, Greece, Cyprus and Malta – aimed at putting on a united front on Brexit.
“First we must negotiate (Britain’s) withdrawal, and then we will talk of future ties,” Rajoy summed up after the summit.
They agreed that one of the most pressing issues to address as Britain leaves the bloc is the status of EU citizens living in the United Kingdom, and Britons residing in Europe.
“We believe this is one of the first things we need to resolve, that people cannot be used as bargaining chips,” Joseph Muscat, prime minister of Malta which holds the rotating EU Council presidency, said after the meeting.
“We believe there should be a clear and fast decision to the issue regarding citizens.”
It is the third gathering of its kind following meetings in Athens in September and Lisbon in January.
The leaders also discussed the future of the bloc after Britain leaves, as well as crux issues such as the economy and the refugee crisis.(ap)
As usual, our corrupt and incompetent politicians conflate a large number of issues within one discussion. Why? Because it’s much easier to paint monochrome pictures than to use colours to represent the complexity of reality. What are some of the issues?
(1) What was the nerve gas used, who has it, and how was it deployed?
(2) If it was the Syrians (as seems likely), did the Russians know?
(3) Why did Trump suddenly decide to bomb Syria? (Most likely answer: to look good with declining popularity in the polls).
(4) Does the USA have the legal/moral right to bomb Syria without UNSC explicit approval?
(5) Does the Pres of the USA have the legal authority to bomb a country that the USA is not at war with, without approval of Congress?
(6) Why was the EU not consulted over the bombing (we know that Russia was informed)?
(7) How is Trump going to continue making military decisions? Is this all going to be outside of political and formal structures? (Likely answer, Yes. Trump likes to do as he likes — true fascist style)
And did the EU national governments raise any one of these issues?
Still, I cannot stop being amazed at the collective stupidity of the European leadership. Put Donald’s pea brain as well and the conclusions can be really frightening. They are capable of having a nuclear war started and them not even knowing why.
Trump’s deployment of 59 missiles aimed at the airstrip was a expensive firework display that hardly damaged the runway. If he had wanted to disable the runway then dropping a load of concrete or even a pile of non-exploding missiles would have been more effective.
It was merely a message and that is why Putin was informed beforehand and could pass the message on to Assad.
Putin’s only real interest is retaining the Mediterranean port, which Russia leases off Syria for his warships.
If the west in colaboration with Russia could unite against Assad and Daesh with the prize of introducing democracy in Syria and a secure Russian lease for the port then I believe that peace would prevail.